Fall 2018 Table of Contents


Brandy Schillace, Editor-in-Chief
Hanna Clutterbuck-Cook, Managing Editor
Anna J. Clutterbuck-Cook, Review Editor

Download PDF of 1:3 [link to come]


Health, Gender, and Embodiment, Part Two
Brandy Schillace, Editor-in-Chief


Pain, Prestige and Embodiment
by Rosemary Behmer Hanson

#MeToo, Mental health, Revenge Porn, and the Nineteenth Century
by Katherine Gilbert

Sharing Pain: Zines and Mental Illness
by Shelley Lloyd

Maternity Stories as Social Change
by Sarah MacDonald

The ART of Infertility: A Community Project Reimagining Reproduction Advocacy
by Maria Novotny

Embodying Trauma: Acute and Accumulated
by Heather Stewart


A Kairotic Moment for Women’s Pain and Illness: A Review of Three Books
Review essay by Caitlin Ray

How to Survive a Plague by David France
Review by Katelyn Smith

Invisible No More by Andrea Ritchie
Review by Ayoola White

The Future of Dósis

Fall 2018 (1:3) is the final issue of Dósis. There will be a Review Supplement (1:3b) issued in November or December of this year, and then the publication will go dormant. For the foreseeable future, this website (medhumdosis.com) will remain online for readers to access the archives going back to March 2011. If you have questions please contact Brandy Schillace at bls10@case.edu.

Download PDF of 1:1 (Winter/Fall 2018).

Download PDF of 1:2 (Summer 2018).

Download PDF of 1:3 (Fall 2018). [link to come]

Download PDF of 1:3b (Fall 2018 Review Supplement). [link to come]

Winter/Spring 2018 Table of Contents


Dósis 1.1: sickness and health in the era of Trump

Brandy Schillace, Editor-in-Chief
Hanna Clutterbuck-Cook, Managing Editor
Anna J. Clutterbuck-Cook, Review Editor

Support Dósis on Patreon so that we can pay our contributors!

Download PDF


Sickness and Health in the Era of Trump
Brandy Schillace, Editor-in-Chief


Women’s Health in the Age of Trump
Rosemary Talbot Behmer Hansen

Theorizing Madness in Maddening Times
Kellie Herson

Sex Work and Public Health in the Age of Trump
Stephanie Kaylor

The Global Gag Rule: A Policy Without a Cause
Priyanjana Pramanik


The Edinburgh Companion to the Critical Medical Humanities by Anne Whitehead, et. al.
Review by Burcu Alkan

The Wrong Way to Save Your Life by Megan Stielstra
Review by Julia Brown

Reproductive Justice: An Introduction by Loretta J. Ross and Rickie Solinger
Review by Anna J. Clutterbuck-Cook

Politics of the Pantry: Housewives, Food, and Consumer Protest in Twentieth-Century America by E. LB. Twarog
Review by Emily J. H. Contois

Ask: Building Consent Culture by Kitty Stryker, ed.
Review by Pam Harvey

Our Lady of Charity in Ireland by Jacinta Prunty
Review by David Kilgannon

True Sex: The Lives of Trans Men at the Turn of the 20th Century by Emily Skidmore
Review by Laura Koch

Nasty Women: Feminism, Resistance, and Revolution in Trump’s America by Samhita Mukhopadhyay and Kate Harding, eds.
Review by Heather Stewart

Border Patrol Nation: Dispatches from the Front Lines of Homeland Security by Todd Miller
Review by Molly Todd

The Death Gap: How Inequality Kills by David A. Ansell
Review by Susan Zinner

Call for Pitches: Summer 2018

Issue 1: 2: Health, Gender, Embodiment [CFP for Summer 2018 closed]


Support Dósis on Patreon so that we can pay our contributors!




Editorial: Health, Gender, and Embodiment: Part Two

by Brandy Schillace, Editor-in-Chief

In this, our third and final issue of 2018, we present a series of thoughtful essays to carry us through the electoral season. Since our inception, which pre-dated the Dosis name, we’ve undertaken to present issues of health and social justice. Never has the call to action and advocacy seemed more necessary than now, as we watch women’s voices silenced or disbelieved by party politics, and the rights of LGBT, women, and minorities facing further restriction. Your words, your voices, matter. These essays, which follow on as part two of Gender, Health, and Embodiment (for part one, see Summer 1:2) speak to access, to history, and to our need of mutual support networks. From mental health history (Gilbert) and embodied pain and trauma (Stewart and Hansen), to issues of maternity and infertility (MacDonald and Novotny) and the rhetoric of depression narratives (Lloyd), our Fall/Winter issue brings the ongoing struggles for acceptance and voice to the fore.

This issue will also mark our last for the Dosis blogzine. But while we will not be posting additional CFPs in the foreseeable future, we are not closing our doors. The blog will continue to operate as archive for reading these works, and there may occasionally be additional editorial posts. Our work here has been an honor, but we’ve turned energies into other channels, still fighting the good fight for inclusivity and social justice. I would like, here, to particularly thank the Managing editor, Hanna Clutterbuck-Cook, and the Book Review editor, Anna Clutterbuck-Cook. Their titles do not do justice to the amount of behind the scenes work they have undertaken in the last 3+ years. I would like also to thank our engaged authors for sharing their time and words with us. And finally, hats off to you, our readers. We know that you are out doing your part. We encourage you not to lose hope, and to come together for support and self-care. And of course, as our cover image to the downloadable and sharable PDF makes clear, we thank you for voting for change!

Feature: Pain, Prestige and Embodiment

by Rosemary Talbot Behmer Hansen, MA, MPH

It’s estimated that tens of millions of women in the U.S. are dealing with unnecessary pain because doctors assume that, even if there is something wrong with them, they’re probably exaggerating their symptoms. Simply put, medicine doesn’t trust women to be familiar with their own bodies. [1]

There is “no shortage” of data that confirms that men receive superior management for chronic pain. [2] This essay will use fibromyalgia as a case study for assessing how gender identity unjustly exacerbates physical and psychosocial suffering for chronic pain patients.

Fibromyalgia Background

Fibromyalgia Syndrome is a condition characterized by chronic widespread pain and somatic symptoms. While the disease mechanisms are yet to be entirely understood, fibromyalgia has been shown to be due to an abnormal interaction of neurological, neuro-hormonal, and immunological systems. Symptoms include pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, memory and mood deficiencies. As well as having genetic components, fibromyalgia can be triggered by psychological trauma, infection, and physical pain experiences. Newer diagnostic criteria reveal a fibromyalgia female to male ratio of 2:1, which is similar to those of other chronic pain disorders. There is no cure for fibromyalgia. Patients can sometimes find relief with pharmacological, psychological, educational or holistic therapies. [3]

History of Women’s Pain

“…the outlook for patients is rosier than you might expect given the condition’s perplexing reputation.” [3]

Long before chronic pain conditions such as fibromyalgia were coined, women who reported pain, distress and fatigue were given the diagnosis of hysteria. Latin for “womb,” hysteria in the 18th century was thought to originate in women’s reproductive systems. In the 20th century, Freud proposed that hysteria was a conversion of psychological distress, brought on by repressed memories that manifested in female bodies. Men diagnosed with hysteria were described as “weak, effeminate creatures” without the qualities that are seen as “appropriately masculine.” [5]

The term “fibrositis” was coined by a 1968 physician in Illinois to describe “a constellation of generalized stiffness, headaches, malaise, and tender points… [in women] who tended to be “worry warts.” The trigger for the exclusively-female fibrositis was believed to be “reckless emotion.” [3] In the late 1980s, fibrositis evolved into the diagnosis called fibromyalgia. The diagnosis allowed people living with chronic pain to find support from rheumatologists who finally saw their pain as a disease of the body, and not the mind. [5]

Criticism of fibromyalgia patient credibility was swift. A physician stated that people with fibromyalgia syndrome had real pain, but suffered from an inability to cope with both the intensity of their symptoms as well as, in general, the various stressors in their lives. [6] He, like many other doctors, believed fibromyalgia enabled patients to abuse the medical system. Indeed, Indiana University Neurology Professor John Kincaid estimates that about half of all physicians today do not believe that fibromyalgia exists—a notion that is contrary to the findings of countless researchers, the World Health Organization and the American College of Rheumatology. [3]

Disease Prestige

…diseases and specialties associated with technologically sophisticated, immediate and invasive procedures in vital organs located in the upper parts of the body are given high prestige scores… At the other end, low prestige scores are given to diseases and specialties associated with chronic conditions located in the lower parts of the body or having no specific bodily location, with less visible treatment procedures, and with elderly patients. [7]

This is the conclusion from a 2008 Norwegian study, which asked senior physicians, general practitioners and senior medical students to all rank 38 diseases, including cancer and diabetes, in terms of prestige. Fibromyalgia was ranked last by all three participant groups. [7]

Disease prestige can impact the quality of treatment a patient receives. Access to care, hospital funding, medical research and funding, and physician support, have all been associated with disease hierarchy. [8, 9] In a blog written by a physician who was diagnosed with fibromyalgia, she asserted that the primary reason why fibromyalgia research has inadequate support is sexism. [10] Her sentiment is supported by a National Fibromyalgia Association medical advisor, Dr. Patrick Wood, who argues that the complaints of fibromyalgia patients are dismissed because they are women. [4]

Physician Heroics

“…physicians value narratives in which they are portrayed as ‘masculine and extraordinary lifesavers’, reflecting deep-rooted heroic tales of Western culture.” [9]

When treating a patient in an acute, urgent circumstance such as during a heart attack, physicians are required to perform systematic medical evaluations and use highly technological interventions when time is of the essence. Studies have confirmed that many physicians find these dramatic moments to be of high interest. [9]

Fibromyalgia patients may inadvertently challenge traditional physician roles of being “extraordinary lifesavers.” Diagnosing fibromyalgia, in many ways, requires physicians to admit that they “just don’t know what’s wrong.” [11] This is a tough thing to do when Western culture associates medical certainty with physician prestige. Furthermore, treating fibromyalgia patients involves a longitudinal process of therapeutic trial and error. [4] These patients are not damsels in distress to be quickly rescued from the jaws of death; they may instead be viewed as challenging women who oftentimes fail to immediately respond to medical treatments. In short, saving the “weaker sex” from chronic pain is trying. [10] Accordingly, some physicians find treating patients with fibromyalgia “tremendously frustrating” and a “thankless task.” [4, 12, 13]

Embodied Suffering

“Sometimes [doctors] take out their frustrations on the patients and blame the patients for the illnesses… There’s a long history of this in medicine.” [4]

Women do not just suffer from fibromyalgia itself; they suffer from the sexism related to attempting to find and receive appropriate medical care. One physician argued that chronic pain becomes “involved in a lifestyle mix,” and that all associated symptoms become prominent “when the individual focuses on herself and her discomfort.” [6] The author follows this statement with a more overtly sexist remark: “it is mostly women who fall into this category.” [6] Similarly, some physicians who treat chronic pain patients report not trusting their patients or their experiences of pain. [13, 14] It takes on average about five years for chronic pain patients like those with fibromyalgia to receive a proper diagnosis. [16]

The term “fibromyalgia personality” is sometimes used to stigmatize fibromyalgia patients as inherently irrational and hysterical. One physician said, “You immediately know they have [Fibromyalgia], often even before they say anything, just from the way they’re behaving and their personality.” [5] It is of no surprise, then, that women with medically unexplained disorders have reported being met with “skepticism,” “feeling rejected, ignored,” and being “blamed for their condition” by their physicians. Women experience illness in “delegitimizing and stigmatizing” ways because both their moral character and their mental health are frequently questioned by others, “doctors in particular.” [15]

The doctor-patient relationship in adversarial instances like these may devolve into one of scrutiny, distrust and disgust. This unique dismissal of women’s pain as irrational, emotional, psychological, immoral, and potentially deserved, is not surprising from a feminist perspective. [3, 4, 16, 17, 18] In the fibromyalgia community, it is referred to as the “credibility issue,” and its consequences to the afflicted may include: psychosocial problems, refusal to seek medical care, self-blame and loathing, worsening of condition, and suicide. [4, 11, 19] Fibromyalgia patients may become subject to physical and moral scrutiny from friends, family members, coworkers, and total strangers. [4, 17]

In short, women with fibromyalgia risk being cast as bad women. They may be perceived as any combination of ungrateful, lazy, hysterical, after disability benefits, and manipulative. [6] Because they inadvertently challenge common societal narratives about physician roles, they risk causing their healthcare providers to feel frustrated, delegitimized, and even emasculated. We should therefore not be surprised that living with fibromyalgia can be “re-[traumatizing].” [19] Disease, gender and society interact, forcing those with fibromyalgia to embody the role of deviant womanhood.

Person Prestige

“According to a National Pain Report survey conducted last year, a staggering 90 percent of women with chronic pain feel that the health care system discriminates against them.” [11]

A quick, informal survey of my Facebook friends revealed a startling quantity of stories about pain dismissal and credibility challenges in biomedical settings. Regardless of illness type, many of my friends had been made to feel like they had become problems, rather than merely had problems: their cases were viewed as atypical, uninteresting, or altogether fake; their very beings were criticized. Thankfully, after relentlessly advocating for themselves, most of them eventually found affirmative, compassionate and appropriate healthcare services elsewhere. But what happens to those who cannot advocate for themselves? How do our collective societal values increase suffering for the sick and injured?

Stigma is unjust because it uniquely punishes already-marginalized people by treating them as social deviants. It enables xenophobia in society and ultimately jeopardizes population health. We see the effects of stigma in the Norwegian researchers’ disease prestige hierarchy list, too, when reviewing diseases with the lowest prestige: anxiety neurosis, hepatocirrhosis (cirrhosis of the liver), depressive neurosis, schizophrenia, anorexia, and AIDS. [7] When we consider the patient populations at risk for these diseases, it appears that the prestige of the patient matters when determining disease hierarchy: disease prestige impacts patient prestige, and patient prestige impacts disease prestige. We have seen this most disturbingly play out in the ongoing HIV/AIDS crisis, where patient nationality, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, profession, religion, economic status and other identities intersect to determine public sympathy for the afflicted and public support for global health interventions.

Whether we are discussing syphilis, myocardial infarction, breast cancer, substance abuse disorders, or any other condition, patient identity need not exacerbate patient suffering. There is room for improvement. We can start by challenging harmful notions of physician prestige, fighting problematic ideas of disease prestige, and believing that neither pain nor person is invisible.

Rosemary Talbot Behmer Hansen is an M.D. candidate at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School in Newark, New Jersey. She has both an M.A. in Bioethics and an M.P.H. with a major in Health Policy & Management from Case Western Reserve University (May, 2018) and her academic interests include issues of patient autonomy and medical decision-making. She lives in the Greater New York City area with her husband Ryan Behmer Hansen and dog, Franklin.


  1. Vail N. 6 absurd ways modern medicine fails because of sexism. Cracked.
  2. Edelberg D. Fibromyalgia confounds allopathic habits of mind. AMA J Ethics. 2012; 14(4):305-309.
  3. Stetka B. Fibromyalgia: Maligned, misunderstood and (finally) treatable. Scientific American. Published 2014. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  4. Williams I. Why fibromyalgia has a credibility problem. Health.com. Published 2016. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  5. Oldfield M. “It’s not all in my head. The pain I feel is real”: How moral judgement marginalizes women with fibromyalgia in Canadian health care. Womens Heal Urban Life. 2013;12(1):39-60.
  6. Ehrlich GE. Pain is real; Fibromyalgia isn’t. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(8):1666-1667.
  7. Album, D. & Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(1):182-188.
  8.   Stone L. When you’re sick, the support you’ll get may depend on the “worth” of your disease. The Conversation. Published 2018. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  9.   Ng BK. Disease prestige: A case of hierarchy in medical conditions and specialties. MIMS Today. https://today.mims.com/a-case-of-hierarchy-in-medical-conditions-and-specialities. Published 2017. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  10.   O’Connor MI. The woman patient: Is her voice heard? Sharing Mayo Clinic. Published 2013. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  11.   Culp-Ressler T. When gender stereotypes become a serious hazard to women’s health. ThinkProgress.
  12.   Gordon DA. Fibromyalgia–Real or imagined? J Rheumatol. 2003;30(8):1665-1666.
  13.   Matthias, M. S., Parpart, A. L., Nyland, K. A., Huffman, M. A., Stubbs, D. L., Sargent, C. & Blair MJ. The patient-provider relationship in chronic pain care: Providers’ perspectives. Pain Med. 2010;11(11):1688-1697.
  14.   Associates PDHR. Americans Talk about Pain; A Survey among Adults Nationwide.; 2003.
  15.   Werner, A. & Malterud K. It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: Encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(8):1409-1419.
  16.   Dusenbery M. Is medicine’s gender bias killing young women? Pacific Standard.
  17.   Smith SE. Chronic pain is overwhelmingly experienced by women– So why do they have trouble getting care for it? Rewire.News.
  18.   Tasca, C., Rapetti, M., Carta, M. G. & Fadda B. Women and hysteria in the history of mental health. Clin Pr Epidemiol Ment Heal. 2012;(8):110-119. doi:10.2174/1745017901208010110.
  19.   Swannell C. Prestige: The tyranny of the hierarchy of disease. DoctorPortal.com. Published 2018. Accessed May 31, 2018.
  20. Camberlain, M. & Myhal G. Are we profiling patients with fibromyalgia? Pain Res Manag. 2009;14(3):238.